Topic: Expert Witness

A host shares an anecdote about being contacted by a major law firm to serve as an expert witness in a lawsuit against Google. The legal team reportedly sought to prove that Google is not a publisher, contradicting the host's public stance that search engines and social networks act as publishers through the use of editorializing algorithms. The interaction highlights the legal battle over whether tech giants should retain Section 230 immunity.

A host recounts experiences serving as an expert witness in the AMD vs. Intel legal battles. The process involved lengthy depositions designed to rack up legal fees, with lawyers questioning the host's expertise and credentials in the technology sector.

The hosts analyze the strategy behind the Personal Audio lawsuit, suggesting it is a "trial balloon" to establish the validity of a pending patent. They argue that if the company wanted real money, they would target well-funded entities like NPR or the BBC rather than independent podcasters. One host discusses his experience as an expert witness in patent cases and warns of "quasi-scams" where companies settle for undisclosed licensing fees.

Personal experiences serving as an expert witness in high-stakes Silicon Valley technology lawsuits are shared. The discussion covers the tactical use of document stalling in cases like Intel vs. AMD and the process of providing depositions for companies like Microsoft and Lindows.

A 1993 lawsuit involving MTV and the mtv.com domain name is recalled, highlighting the early days of digital discovery and the use of video depositions. The financial aspects of being an expert witness are also discussed, with hourly rates ranging from $200 to $1,000.