Topic: 9 11 Pilots For Truth

Adam Curry and Dana Brunetti discuss various anomalies surrounding the 9/11 attacks, including the collapse of Building 7 and the recovery of a hijacker's passport on the street. Curry, a pilot, mentions his past involvement with Pilots for 9/11 Truth, questioning the flight maneuvers performed by the hijacked aircraft.

Over 1,000 members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth held a global press conference on February 19, 2010, to challenge the official narrative of the Twin Towers' collapse. They argue that the pulverization of buildings into powder and the free-fall acceleration of World Trade Center 7 suggest controlled demolition. The hosts compare the lack of collapse in the Austin IRS building fire to the 2001 events.

The organization Pilots for 9/11 Truth analyzed NTSB data from the Pentagon attack, claiming the black box recorded the flight deck door as remaining closed throughout the flight. The hosts discuss anomalies in the data, including the aircraft's reported altitude and the lack of typical debris at the crash site.

The organization 9/11 Pilots for Truth challenges the official 9/11 Commission Report regarding the speed and altitude of the aircraft that struck the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. They claim it is physically impossible for a Boeing aircraft to maintain 400 miles per hour at 700 feet due to air resistance. Further claims suggest that cell phone calls from the flights were impossible above 1,000 feet.

The segment examines claims from the group "Pilots for 9/11 Truth" regarding the flight data recorder from the plane that hit the Pentagon. The group alleges that the NTSB data shows the aircraft was at an altitude that would have overflown the building. They argue that the maneuvers required to hit the side of the Pentagon were impossible for a 757, suggesting a missile was used instead.

The organization Pilots for 9/11 Truth analyzed NTSB black box data obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. Their simulation of the flight path toward the Pentagon suggests the aircraft was at an altitude of 480 feet at the time of the alleged impact, which would have resulted in it flying over the building. Discrepancies in pressure settings and altimeter resets are cited as areas requiring further investigation.