53:31 with the suffix anal. Well that was an ode to John C Dvorak, well I think you might as well get into these clips because the fact that you have some anal clips is just this analysis must be fantastic So this is, I believe his full name is Garland Favarito. And I've interviewed him one time he's an investigator out in Georgia and he has been looking at the shenanigans going on in Georgia since the 2020 election. Right. When you talk to this guy, he is a walking encyclopedia. He just bop-bop-bop-bop-bop-bop. What he's talking to Christy Lee, a former reporter she was at Infowars a few years ago she moved on
54:13 I believe this is a Lindell TV clip. So she's working for Lindell TV where they allow you to put your opinions out in your interviewing, where they don't always do that in other places. But what they're talking about is the ruling with the mail-in ballots and how that was just a stalling tactic basically by the judge because she kept making these rulings and then they'd have to go to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court would rule knock it back down, then she'd do another ruling. And he's basically analyzed her pattern at the end of it, he said she's basically a partisan hack trying to do anything to delay this. So like we covered last show, well they're not going to have time the postal service is not going to have time to do this because oh it just happened now but there are- This happened back in March when Trump first tried to get the postal service in on this so they did have time Now they might not have time now because we're into September and maybe there's a final ruling in you know two or three weeks and then you know you're a month away from the election so yeah you have to
55:13 You have to get this stuff, especially when you're dealing with this amount of these large databases. But yeah, this is Garland Favarito we'll start with ruling one. anal. And her rulings, which have been overturned by the Georgia Supreme Court date back months. And now she's basically given her political friends, the 23 Democrat AGs some ammunition to say well oh you know there is not enough time so on and so on. Well the reason there is not enough time is exactly what you just said Christy she created the chaos
56:12 It wasn't President Trump, but in making false rulings that had to be overturned by the United States Supreme Court. She is the one who delayed everything for months and basically created the chaos. Now correct me if I'm wrong Rob, but judges even federally approved judges they don't have to be lawyers or necessarily schools in law do they? No, in fact it's okay for some of these judges who aren't lawyers to own businesses where they're sending their inmates. The people that hit the right right exactly but be a bit people don't understand that thing Oh well you know federal judge judge knows what they're doing But there's that's far from it I remember we were much more involved in local politics than ever was living in Fredericksburg but I saw who was running for
57:12 For Gillespie County judge, I'm like she can run? No. No no no! I don't want her a judge of anything you know it was kind of weird i didn't really even realize that and so this is the same with the federally appointed judges So then they rule by feelings is what you end up getting. Pretty much, yeah! Yeah so and then he goes on through this and just explaining how the things she's doing... You have to actually have a damage before you can make these rulings that she made. Right, you have to be hurt. You have to show on the doll where you were hurt before you can do anything like that. And right and she's ruling before these judgments even come in or before the announcements even come in of these pro
57:57 program so before trump even did this she was already had her thing ready and to to. I guess spring it on them to kind of you know she's playing the tar baby game she's throwing babies out there to get people caught up in him and you know obviously is working so it's a strategy that they're gonna keep doing she speculated the claims that the state AGs have. There's no evidence that- No evidence, no evidence! ...the claims were true because in any court of law you have to have what they call a particularized injury so you have to have a specific injury that you are suing about well... The rule has never been implemented and in fact when they filed the case the rule hadn't even been published
58:46 And there's no way she has to know that that was an illegitimate ruling in the first place. So she is using her political motives rather than actually ruling on facts and evidence. But isn't this what eventually went to the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court said, you know, there was no harm so it doesn't count right now or is this after all of that? Then he explains how The Supreme Court basically admonished her and told her, they gave her a lecture and told her there's six different ways that this your argument is wrong. You have to fill these out. And at this point you would think the Supreme Court could go hey now we're just taking away your judgeship because now you're just wasting everyone's time I don't know what you do with some of these judges because it's like they can't be touched and they're just allowed to muck up the works. I mean you have to have basics
59:41 to move these things forward. It's like a frivolous lawsuit, yeah. And she was just actually admonished up one side and down the other by the Supreme Court over that very thing they listed like six different types of speculations she would have to do to reach the conclusion that she reached in the initial injunction And that was, of course each one of the six would throw the case out because you have to have a concrete particularized injury which is what they explained to her. That's something that literally every lawyer out of law school
1:00:23 law school knows that you have to have a concrete particularized injury to sue in civil court. So it's not a matter of her being stupid, I think it has to be a matter of her being corrupt. Yeah. Being political is all about the mid-terms and obviously there are at least 26 states who don't want this to happen and I presume most of them are Democrat states but I'm not even so sure. Nevada just pulled a bunch of people off the rolls and I think it's like 400,000 or something. Really? Yeah, I think it was Nevada. I guarantee you if you just gave me the voter rolls which is just a spreadsheet You can get it They have to give it to you If he asked for it I could vibe code this in a day Just give me an old IBM laptop Give me a ThinkPad I'm sure I can do it I got a couple clips on this