# Missouri V Biden on The No Agenda Show Missouri V Biden comes up in 11 chapters across 11 episodes of The No Agenda Show, from October 2014 to June 2024. - **Chapters:** 11 - **Episodes:** 11 - **Discussed:** October 2014 – June 2024 - **Related topics:** [Censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [First Amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [Supreme Court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [Amicus Brief](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amicus-brief.md), [Joe Biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/joe-biden.md), [Samuel Alito](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/samuel-alito.md), [Social Media](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/social-media.md), [White House](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/white-house.md), [Amy Coney Barrett](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amy-coney-barrett.md), [Census](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/census.md) ## Chapters 1–11 of 11 ### Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Standing Ruling - **Episode:** [1672: Sand Battery](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1672-sand-battery.md) - **Published:** 2024-06-27 - **Time:** 53:02–56:02 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1672-sand-battery/chapter/missouri-v-biden-supreme-court-standing-ruling.md The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden lacked legal standing to challenge the White House's communication with social media companies regarding misinformation. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, while Justice Alito dissented, calling it a critical free speech case. The ruling effectively punts the merits of the censorship dispute back to lower courts. Keywords: [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [amy coney barrett](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amy-coney-barrett.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), social media censorship ### Supreme Court Arguments in Missouri v. Biden Censorship Case - **Episode:** [1644: Shock Opera](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1644-shock-opera.md) - **Published:** 2024-03-23 - **Time:** 1:06:09–1:15:27 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1644-shock-opera/chapter/supreme-court-arguments-in-missouri-v-biden-censorship-case.md The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Missouri v. Biden, a case examining whether the federal government unconstitutionally coerced social media companies to censor content. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concern that the First Amendment might "hamstring" the government during emergencies, while Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned the use of Section 230 as a tool for inducement. The case centers on White House communications regarding COVID-19 vaccines and election integrity. Keywords: [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [social media](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/social-media.md) ### Missouri vs. Biden, Supreme Court and Amicus Briefs - **Episode:** [1634: Nukes in Space!](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1634-nukes-in-space.md) - **Published:** 2024-02-16 - **Time:** 1:53:32–1:55:44 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1634-nukes-in-space/chapter/missouri-vs-biden-supreme-court-and-amicus-briefs.md The "Missouri vs. Biden" case regarding government-pressured social media censorship is heading to the Supreme Court. There is a proposal for the "No Agenda Show" to file an amicus brief to represent the interests of independent podcasters and producers who have faced shadow-banning or content removal. The goal is to have the podcasting perspective considered by the justices in this landmark free speech case. Keywords: [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [amicus brief](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amicus-brief.md), [podcasting](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/podcasting.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Amicus Briefs - **Episode:** [1620: Yoko Swifto](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1620-yoko-swifto.md) - **Published:** 2023-12-28 - **Time:** 34:42–38:23 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1620-yoko-swifto/chapter/missouri-v-biden-supreme-court-amicus-briefs.md The Missouri v. Biden lawsuit regarding government-coerced social media censorship has reached the Supreme Court. Nineteen amicus briefs have been filed, including submissions from medical associations arguing that the government had a "compelling interest" to suppress speech regarding vaccine safety. The CDC continues to emphasize the importance of vaccines for RSV, flu, and COVID-19 in children. Keywords: [missouri v biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [amicus brief](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amicus-brief.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Social Media Stay - **Episode:** [1602: Net Equity](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1602-net-equity.md) - **Published:** 2023-10-26 - **Time:** 1:01:46–1:09:08 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1602-net-equity/chapter/missouri-v-biden-supreme-court-social-media-stay.md The Supreme Court has temporarily stayed an injunction that limited the Biden administration's communication with social media companies regarding content moderation. The case, Missouri v. Biden, alleges government coercion in removing posts related to COVID-19 and elections. Commentary from the "Pivot" podcast is used to illustrate the divide between those viewing the communication as "working together" and those seeing it as a First Amendment violation. Keywords: [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [cisa](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/cisa.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Review of Censorship - **Episode:** [1601: Unkool & The Gang](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1601-unkool-the-gang.md) - **Published:** 2023-10-22 - **Time:** 2:00:36–2:03:44 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1601-unkool-the-gang/chapter/missouri-v-biden-supreme-court-review-of-censorship.md The Supreme Court has accepted the Missouri v. Biden case for review, bypassing typical procedural steps. Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissented on a stay, expressing concern over the government's ability to "launder" censorship through social media companies ahead of the next election. Keywords: [missouri v biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [samuel alito](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/samuel-alito.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Stay - **Episode:** [1591: Half-Jacked](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1591-half-jacked.md) - **Published:** 2023-09-17 - **Time:** 1:04:59–1:07:18 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1591-half-jacked/chapter/missouri-v-biden-supreme-court-stay.md Justice Samuel Alito granted a temporary stay in the Missouri v. Biden case, which involves allegations of government pressure on social media companies to censor content. The federal government is seeking a full Supreme Court review of the injunction that limits their communication with tech platforms. Keywords: [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [samuel alito](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/samuel-alito.md), [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Fifth Circuit Court, Social Media Censorship - **Episode:** [1590: Bold Action](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1590-bold-action.md) - **Published:** 2023-09-14 - **Time:** 31:29–36:57 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1590-bold-action/chapter/missouri-v-biden-fifth-circuit-court-social-media-censorship.md The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction in the Missouri v. Biden case, ruling that the White House and federal agencies likely coerced social media platforms into censoring content. The court described the administration's actions as a "coordinated campaign" that jeopardized the First Amendment. The discussion touches on the migration of users to alternative platforms like Blue Sky, Threads, and Mastodon following changes at Twitter. Keywords: [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), fifth circuit, [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [white house](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/white-house.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Federal Injunction Against Censorship - **Episode:** [1570: Unbanked](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1570-unbanked.md) - **Published:** 2023-07-06 - **Time:** 18:56–24:32 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1570-unbanked/chapter/missouri-v-biden-federal-injunction-against-censorship.md Judge Terry Doughty issued a significant preliminary injunction in the Missouri v. Biden case, prohibiting federal agencies from communicating with social media companies to suppress protected speech. The ruling describes the government's actions as a "massive attack" on free speech in U.S. history. Critics in the media argue the decision could hamper efforts to combat misinformation, while proponents view it as a victory for the First Amendment. Keywords: terry doughty, [missouri v biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [free speech](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/free-speech.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [social media](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/social-media.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md) ### Door-to-Door Vaccine Outreach, Biden Administration Strategy - **Episode:** [1362: Shot to Win](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1362-shot-to-win.md) - **Published:** 2021-07-09 - **Time:** 58:03–1:02:58 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1362-shot-to-win/chapter/door-to-door-vaccine-outreach-biden-administration-strategy.md White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki and President Joe Biden announce a "door-to-door" outreach program to increase vaccination rates. The hosts express concern over government lists and privacy, questioning how officials decide which homes to visit. A clip of Biden bumbling the explanation—stating they need to get people "protected from the virus"—is highlighted as a gaffe. Keywords: [jen psaki](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/jen-psaki.md), [joe biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/joe-biden.md), [vaccine outreach](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/vaccine-outreach.md), [missouri](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri.md), [census](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/census.md) ### White House Security Flaws, Joe Biden Gaffes - **Episode:** [658: It's a Glitch!](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/658-it-s-a-glitch.md) - **Published:** 2014-10-05 - **Time:** 1:34:26–1:38:19 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/658-it-s-a-glitch/chapter/white-house-security-flaws-joe-biden-gaffes.md Recent security breaches at the White House, including a fence jumper and shots fired in 2011, are scrutinized. Vice President Joe Biden is highlighted for a recent gaffe in which he claimed 161,000 people died in the Joplin, Missouri tornado, when the actual death toll was 161. Keywords: [white house](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/white-house.md), [secret service](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/secret-service.md), [joe biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/joe-biden.md), joplin missouri, [gaffes](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/gaffes.md) --- This is the markdown version of a page on The No Agenda Show for AI agents. Every public page on this site has one: add `.md` to its URL, or request it with `Accept: text/markdown`. - [Site index for agents (llms.txt)](https://search.noagendashow.net/llms.txt) - [Home](https://search.noagendashow.net/index.md) - [Search transcripts](https://search.noagendashow.net/search.md) - [All episodes](https://search.noagendashow.net/episodes.md) - [Topics](https://search.noagendashow.net/topics.md) - [People](https://search.noagendashow.net/people.md)