# Legal Definition on The No Agenda Show Legal Definition comes up in 8 chapters across 8 episodes of The No Agenda Show, from May 2009 to May 2026. - **Chapters:** 8 - **Episodes:** 8 - **Discussed:** May 2009 – May 2026 - **Related topics:** [Constitution](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/constitution.md), [First Amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [Alan Dershowitz](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/alan-dershowitz.md), [Andrew Napolitano](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/andrew-napolitano.md), [Black Powder](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/black-powder.md), [Criminal Intent](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/criminal-intent.md), [Dylann Roof](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/dylann-roof.md), [Grand Jury](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/grand-jury.md), [Hate Speech](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/hate-speech.md), [Ied](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/ied.md) ## Chapters 1–8 of 8 ### Alan Dershowitz on Jeffrey Epstein and Victim Claims - **Episode:** [1867: Transmission Window](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1867-transmission-window.md) - **Published:** 2026-05-10 - **Time:** 1:38:36–1:42:09 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1867-transmission-window/chapter/alan-dershowitz-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-victim-claims.md Alan Dershowitz argues that Jeffrey Epstein was not a "pedophile" by medical definition, as his interests were in 16-to-18-year-olds. Dershowitz calls for a thorough investigation into the "claimed survivors," suggesting that many were recruited by corrupt lawyers in Palm Beach to collect settlements for massages they may never have performed. Keywords: [alan dershowitz](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/alan-dershowitz.md), [jeffrey epstein](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/jeffrey-epstein.md), [palm beach](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/palm-beach.md), [pedophilia](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/pedophilia.md), [trafficking](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/trafficking.md), [legal definitions](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definitions.md) ### Journalist Protection Act and Legal Definitions - **Episode:** [1007: Tactical Frustration](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1007-tactical-frustration.md) - **Published:** 2018-02-11 - **Time:** 2:25:08–2:29:53 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1007-tactical-frustration/chapter/journalist-protection-act-and-legal-definitions.md The Journalist Protection Act (HR 4935) proposes making physical assault against journalists a federal crime with penalties of up to six years in prison. However, the bill's legal definition of a "journalist" appears to favor employees of large broadcast and print organizations, potentially excluding independent podcasters and digital creators. The hosts express concern that this creates a protected class of "approved" media figures. Keywords: journalist protection act, hr 4935, [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [news gathering](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/news-gathering.md), [legal definition](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definition.md) ### Redefining Terrorism, Expansion of Police State - **Episode:** [971: MADCOM](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/971-madcom.md) - **Published:** 2017-10-08 - **Time:** 1:09:18–1:12:50 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/971-madcom/chapter/redefining-terrorism-expansion-of-police-state.md The hosts argue that existing laws are sufficient to punish mass killers and that the push to redefine "terrorism" is a move toward a more pervasive police state. They express concern that broadening the definition could eventually include minor offenses like bullying or domestic disputes. Keywords: [terrorism](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/terrorism.md), [police state](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/police-state.md), [timothy mcveigh](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/timothy-mcveigh.md), [dylann roof](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/dylann-roof.md), [legal definitions](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definitions.md) ### Senator Jim Risch, The Definition of Hope - **Episode:** [937: Stump the Algo](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/937-stump-the-algo.md) - **Published:** 2017-06-11 - **Time:** 23:45–26:14 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/937-stump-the-algo/chapter/senator-jim-risch-the-definition-of-hope.md Senator Jim Risch of Idaho questioned James Comey on the specific phrasing used by President Trump regarding Michael Flynn. Risch argued that expressing "hope" that an investigation would be dropped does not constitute a legal order or obstruction of justice, noting that people are rarely charged for their hopes or thoughts. Keywords: [jim risch](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/jim-risch.md), [obstruction of justice](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/obstruction-of-justice.md), [michael flynn](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/michael-flynn.md), [criminal intent](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/criminal-intent.md), [legal definitions](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definitions.md) ### Judge Napolitano Analysis, Special Counsel vs Prosecutor - **Episode:** [930: Off Script](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/930-off-script.md) - **Published:** 2017-05-18 - **Time:** 49:22–51:54 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/930-off-script/chapter/judge-napolitano-analysis-special-counsel-vs-prosecutor.md Judge Andrew Napolitano explains that Robert Mueller's appointment will likely silence public testimony from James Comey as he becomes a witness in a criminal investigation. The discussion explores the linguistic nuances between "special prosecutor," "independent counsel," and "special counsel." Mueller's authority is derived from newer statutes following the expiration of the Independent Counsel Act. Keywords: [andrew napolitano](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/andrew-napolitano.md), [robert mueller](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/robert-mueller.md), [grand jury](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/grand-jury.md), [special counsel](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/special-counsel.md), [legal definitions](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definitions.md) ### Constitutional Definition of Treason, TPP Secrecy - **Episode:** [532: Red Cell](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/532-red-cell.md) - **Published:** 2013-07-21 - **Time:** 2:16:34–2:21:43 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/532-red-cell/chapter/constitutional-definition-of-treason-tpp-secrecy.md Article III of the U.S. Constitution defines treason strictly as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies by giving them aid and comfort. The hosts discuss how this definition is being stretched in the digital age to include online leaks. They also touch on the secrecy of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and how it might influence future definitions of international crime. Keywords: [treason](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/treason.md), [constitution](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/constitution.md), article iii, [trans-pacific partnership](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/trans-pacific-partnership.md), [war](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/war.md), [legal definition](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definition.md) ### Weapon of Mass Destruction, Legal Definitions, Black Powder - **Episode:** [507: Airplane Apocalypse](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/507-airplane-apocalypse.md) - **Published:** 2013-04-25 - **Time:** 20:24–23:30 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/507-airplane-apocalypse/chapter/weapon-of-mass-destruction-legal-definitions-black-powder.md The hosts analyze the legal definition of a "Weapon of Mass Destruction" under 18 USC 232A, noting that it includes devices with as little as a quarter-ounce of black powder. They argue this broad definition effectively turns common fireworks or small improvised devices into WMDs for prosecution purposes. Keywords: [wmd](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/wmd.md), [us code](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/us-code.md), [black powder](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/black-powder.md), [ied](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/ied.md), [legal definition](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definition.md) ### Hate Speech Regulations and Constitutional Protections - **Episode:** [95: We're All Terrorists Now](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/95-we-re-all-terrorists-now.md) - **Published:** 2009-05-07 - **Time:** 53:26–55:13 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/95-we-re-all-terrorists-now/chapter/hate-speech-regulations-and-constitutional-protections.md The hosts debate the nebulous nature of "hate speech" regulations and their conflict with the U.S. Constitution. They argue that defining hate is subjective and could lead to the criminalization of simple criticism or dislike. The discussion explores the boundaries between protected speech, verbal abuse, and physical assault. Keywords: [hate speech](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/hate-speech.md), [constitution](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/constitution.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), verbal abuse, [legal definition](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/legal-definition.md) --- This is the markdown version of a page on The No Agenda Show for AI agents. Every public page on this site has one: add `.md` to its URL, or request it with `Accept: text/markdown`. - [Site index for agents (llms.txt)](https://search.noagendashow.net/llms.txt) - [Home](https://search.noagendashow.net/index.md) - [Search transcripts](https://search.noagendashow.net/search.md) - [All episodes](https://search.noagendashow.net/episodes.md) - [Topics](https://search.noagendashow.net/topics.md) - [People](https://search.noagendashow.net/people.md)