# Amicus Brief on The No Agenda Show Amicus Brief comes up in 4 chapters across 4 episodes of The No Agenda Show, from September 2019 to February 2024. - **Chapters:** 4 - **Episodes:** 4 - **Discussed:** September 2019 – February 2024 - **Related topics:** [Supreme Court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [Censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [Cbs News](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/cbs-news.md), [Civil Rights Act](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/civil-rights-act.md), [Constitution](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/constitution.md), [Employment Law](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/employment-law.md), [First Amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [Gender Identity](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/gender-identity.md), [Margaret Brennan](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/margaret-brennan.md), [Mike Johnson](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/mike-johnson.md) ## Chapters 1–4 of 4 ### Missouri vs. Biden, Supreme Court and Amicus Briefs - **Episode:** [1634: Nukes in Space!](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1634-nukes-in-space.md) - **Published:** 2024-02-16 - **Time:** 1:53:32–1:55:44 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1634-nukes-in-space/chapter/missouri-vs-biden-supreme-court-and-amicus-briefs.md The "Missouri vs. Biden" case regarding government-pressured social media censorship is heading to the Supreme Court. There is a proposal for the "No Agenda Show" to file an amicus brief to represent the interests of independent podcasters and producers who have faced shadow-banning or content removal. The goal is to have the podcasting perspective considered by the justices in this landmark free speech case. Keywords: [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [missouri v. biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [amicus brief](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amicus-brief.md), [podcasting](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/podcasting.md) ### Mike Johnson Defends Constitutional Challenges to 2020 Election - **Episode:** [1623: Deputary](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1623-deputary.md) - **Published:** 2024-01-07 - **Time:** 1:07:12–1:13:24 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1623-deputary/chapter/mike-johnson-defends-constitutional-challenges-to-2020-election.md Speaker of the House Mike Johnson defended his role in the 2020 election challenges during a contentious interview with Margaret Brennan on CBS. Johnson argued that the "Texas Amicus Brief" focused on Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, alleging that state officials changed election laws without legislative approval. He dismissed Brennan's "election denier" label, stating his arguments were based on the plain language of the law. Keywords: [mike johnson](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/mike-johnson.md), [margaret brennan](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/margaret-brennan.md), [cbs news](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/cbs-news.md), texas amicus brief, [constitution](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/constitution.md) ### Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Amicus Briefs - **Episode:** [1620: Yoko Swifto](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1620-yoko-swifto.md) - **Published:** 2023-12-28 - **Time:** 34:42–38:23 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1620-yoko-swifto/chapter/missouri-v-biden-supreme-court-amicus-briefs.md The Missouri v. Biden lawsuit regarding government-coerced social media censorship has reached the Supreme Court. Nineteen amicus briefs have been filed, including submissions from medical associations arguing that the government had a "compelling interest" to suppress speech regarding vaccine safety. The CDC continues to emphasize the importance of vaccines for RSV, flu, and COVID-19 in children. Keywords: [missouri v biden](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/missouri-v-biden.md), [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [first amendment](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/first-amendment.md), [censorship](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/censorship.md), [amicus brief](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amicus-brief.md) ### Title VII Civil Rights Act, Sex vs Gender Identity - **Episode:** [1176: Soest Piet](https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1176-soest-piet.md) - **Published:** 2019-09-29 - **Time:** 1:49:32–1:52:20 - **Transcript:** https://search.noagendashow.net/episode/1176-soest-piet/chapter/title-vii-civil-rights-act-sex-vs-gender-identity.md The legal debate before the Supreme Court centers on whether the word "sex" in the 1964 Civil Rights Act includes sexual orientation and gender identity. Current case law suggests employers can fire individuals for being gay as long as the policy is applied equally to both men and women. Activists seek to expand the definition to provide specific protections for LGBTQ+ individuals under federal law. Keywords: [civil rights act](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/civil-rights-act.md), [supreme court](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/supreme-court.md), [gender identity](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/gender-identity.md), [employment law](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/employment-law.md), [amicus brief](https://search.noagendashow.net/topic/amicus-brief.md) --- This is the markdown version of a page on The No Agenda Show for AI agents. Every public page on this site has one: add `.md` to its URL, or request it with `Accept: text/markdown`. - [Site index for agents (llms.txt)](https://search.noagendashow.net/llms.txt) - [Home](https://search.noagendashow.net/index.md) - [Search transcripts](https://search.noagendashow.net/search.md) - [All episodes](https://search.noagendashow.net/episodes.md) - [Topics](https://search.noagendashow.net/topics.md) - [People](https://search.noagendashow.net/people.md)